Some thoughtful pieces on Mormonism

Slate has a lengthy and fascinating essay on Michael Quinn, who was excommunicated by the LDS in large part because of the historical studies he published. A historian with a PhD from Yale he became active at a heady time in Mormon scholarship, when the archives were opened in the 1970s more broadly than ever before. Unfortunately for Quinn, the brilliance of his scholarship did not lead to a brilliant academic career. Forced out of Brigham Young University, he was basically black-balled, prevented from tenured jobs at the University of Utah and Arizona because of efforts from administrators or faculty. On one level, his story is not unlike that of historians of other American religious traditions who have dared to challenge the official story of their communities, but to lose out on jobs at secular institutions because of fear of backlash from the LDS is unconscionable.

Jackson Lears reviews a number of recent works on Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, and the history of Mormonism:

As Terry Givens suggests in his probing book People of Paradox, the Mormon divinization of the material, even the banal, is akin to a sacramentalist outlook, but without the sense of transcendence and mystery that a remote God provides. Givens is a practicing Mormon with an uncommon sensitivity to the complexities and the vulnerabilities of his faith. He acknowledges the risk of hubris in the Promethean quest for Godhood, recalling the serpent’s promise in paradise (“ye shall be as gods”). This Promethean impulse is reinforced by a Mormon tendency to use a language of empirical certainty, even for propositions that may seem anything but empirical—a tendency traceable back to Joseph Smith. As a result of his visionary experience, he said, “I have learned for myself that Presbyterianism is not true.” The search for empirical (or pseudo-empirical) certainty, bounded by priestly authority, is one engine of eternal progression. Salvation is a process, not a goal; its core is action, not introspection. Much of this theology resonates with commonsense American sensibilities—the priority of matter, the organizer God, the celebration of doing over being, the faith in progress, the prospect of perpetual personal growth.

Lears links the materialism of Mormonism to its success in fomenting capitalism and in the union of the two finds an explanation for Mitt Romney’s career. That might be going a bit far.

Mormonism continues to fascinate scholars and the general public, in part because of the many secret or semi-secret practices as well as the story of its origins. In the biography of Joseph Smith as well as in the story of finding of the Book of Mormon and the tension between the Latter-Day Saints and mainstream America in the 19th century, there is enough detail to puzzle over. That the modern LDS church presents itself as a denomination within Christianity and that contemporary Evangelicals have embraced Romney’s candidacy, shows how far Mormons have come on the road to respectability. It will be interesting to see what happens between the Mormon-Evangelical alliance if Romney loses.

Advertisements

One thought on “Some thoughtful pieces on Mormonism

  1. The claim that “Michael Quinn, … was excommunicated by the LDS in large part because of the historical studies he published” is an oft repeated, but false assertion. In 1993, the LDS Church announced the excommunication of 5 (five) prominent scholars for their actions in publishing material critical of the LDS Church. The five were named publicly by the Church as Lynne Whitesides, Avraham Gileadi, Paul Toscano, Maxine Hanks and Lavina Fielding Anderson. It is rare for the Church to publicly announce excommunications and this generally occurs when the hierarchy of the Church determines that the actions of individuals are so public that the Church feels it is necessary to warn its membership against those individuals. No such public notice was made by the Church concerning Michael Quinn. The only indication that he was excommunicated comes from Quinn himself. His ecclesiastical leader (Paul Hanks) has resolutely refused to make any comment on the subject.

    The fact that the LDS Church has always declined to comment on Quinn’s status indicates an important circumstance: If Quinn was excommunicated, the charge against him was not for public actions–i.e. his published works, but rather for private behavior.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s